Skip Navigation


Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access originally published online on June 13, 2008
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2008 2(2):149-151; doi:10.1093/reep/ren013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/149    most recent
ren013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stavins, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolstad, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Introduction to the Issue

Robert Stavins, Editor, Carlo Carraro, Co-Editor and Charles Kolstad, Co-Editor

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Welcome to this fourth issue of the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, which, as always, includes articles, a symposium focused on a single topic, and a set of features.

In the first of three articles in this issue, Lawrence Goulder and Ian Parry provide a comprehensive and up-to-date examination of a broad and important topic in environmental economics: normative analysis of the choice among alternative policy instruments. They examine the extent to which alternative environmental policy instruments can satisfy the criteria of cost-effectiveness, distributional equity, the ability to address uncertainties, and political feasibility. They consider emissions taxes, tradable emissions allowances, subsidies for emissions reductions, performance standards, mandates for the adoption of specific technologies, and subsidies for research toward . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?