Skip Navigation


Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access originally published online on April 23, 2008
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2008 2(1):45-60; doi:10.1093/reep/rem023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/45    most recent
rem023v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mendelsohn, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Is the Stern Review an Economic Analysis?

Robert Mendelsohn*

* Yale University, 230 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511; telephone: 203-432-5128; e-mail: robert.mendelsohn@yale.edu.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


   Introduction
 
Economists were initially quite enthusiastic when the British HM Treasury Department announced it was conducting an economic analysis of climate change, the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Despite a growing body of research on the economics of climate change (Nordhaus 1991; Manne et al. 1995; Pearce et al. 1996; Plambeck, Hope, and Anderson 1997; Nordhaus and Boyer 2000; Tol 2002a), the insights of economics have been missing from recent national and international scientific reviews of climate change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007; 2001a, b, c; National Assessment Synthesis Team 2001). Economists were optimistic that this new study would inject key economic concepts back into the climate debate.

The Stern Review has been a great disappointment to some economists, this author included. An economic analysis of greenhouse gases should minimize the present value of abatement costs and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   Economic Theory
 

   Empirical Evidence
 
Integrated Assessment Models
Efficient Abatement Paths

   Discussion and Critique of the Stern Review
 
The Stern Review's Approach
Time Horizon
Baseline Scenarios
Discount Rate
Cost of Abatement
Environmental Impacts of Alternative Energy Sources
Market Damages
Nonmarket Damages
Extreme Weather Events
Knock on Damages
Uncertainty
Equity Weighting

   Summary and Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?