Skip Navigation


Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2009
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2009 3(2):167-188; doi:10.1093/reep/rep003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
3/2/167    most recent
rep003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Greenhouse Gas Auctions and Taxes: Some Political Economy Considerations

Robert W. Hahn*

* Robert Hahn is the executive director of the Reg-Markets Center at AEI and a senior visiting fellow at Oxford

Many economists suggest that a cap-and-trade program and a carbon tax represent promising mechanisms for addressing climate change. A potentially attractive feature of both policies is that they have the potential to recycle revenues in an efficient manner. In the case of cap and trade, this would involve using auction revenues; in the case of a tax, it would involve using tax revenues. This article evaluates various arguments for auctions and taxes in light of political realities and finds that the enthusiasm for auctions and taxes has not been accompanied by sober assessments of whether and how the revenues would actually be used. Most of the evidence suggests that at least some of the revenues would not be spent wisely. Specifically, the article urges the government to compare a realistic set of policy options, while recognizing that the feasibility of different types of mechanisms can change over time. Furthermore, it is suggested that the introduction of political economy considerations may lead to an optimal level of pollution control that is less stringent than conventional economic analysis would suggest.


JEL Classification: D44, D61, G18, H2, P16, Q5, Q54

He would like to thank Peter Cramton, Larry Goulder, Allan Ingraham, Al McGartland, Gilbert Metcalf, Ian Parry, Eric Posner, Robert Stavins, David Victor, Michael Wara, and Jonathan Wiener for helpful comments. Caroline Cecot, Poh Lin Tan, Douglas Walton, Adam Schmidt, and Molly Wells provided valuable research assistance. This research was supported by the Reg-Markets Center. The views expressed in this paper reflect solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which he is affiliated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.