Skip Navigation


Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access originally published online on November 6, 2008
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2009 3(1):22-41; doi:10.1093/reep/ren017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
3/1/22    most recent
ren017v2
ren017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livernois, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Q30 - General
Right arrow D90 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

On the Empirical Significance of the Hotelling Rule

John Livernois*

* Department of Economics, University of Guelph; E-mail: live{at}uoguelph.ca

The Hotelling Rule—that price net of marginal cost must rise at the rate of interest in nonrenewable resource markets—forms the theoretical core of the economics of nonrenewable resources. It is present in one form or another in every modern paper on nonrenewable resource economics, and is the conceptual and theoretical framework used by economists to understand and model the long-run evolution of prices and supplies for nonrenewable resources. But what do we know about the empirical significance of the Hotelling Rule? What practical insights has it provided for understanding what we have actually observed in nonrenewable resource markets and how has it stood up to empirical scrutiny? These are the questions addressed in this paper. I review the evidence on the behavior of market prices over time, the evidence on the effects of technological change, direct tests of the Hotelling Rule, and the performance of the Hotelling Valuation Principle.


JEL Classification: Q30, D90


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.