Skip Navigation


Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access originally published online on July 11, 2008
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2008 2(2):261-275; doi:10.1093/reep/ren003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/261    most recent
ren003v2
ren003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Portney, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm
Right arrow L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope
Right arrow M14 - Corporate Culture; Social Responsibility
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The (Not So) New Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Perspective

Paul R. Portney*

* Eller College of Management, University of Arizona

There now exists a large and growing literature on what has come to be known as "corporate social responsibility" (CSR). The largest strand of this literature is devoted to studies that attempt to determine whether CSR is associated with superior financial performance for those firms that engage in it. This article first provides a definition of CSR that makes it possible to talk about it in a concrete way; it then identifies the ways in which CSR might lead to superior financial performance; next it reviews the empirical evidence bearing on this hypothesis; finally, the paper concludes by asking whether this much-hyped phenomenon is really that new after all and suggests that normative judgments about CSR are more complicated than one might think.


JEL Classification: L21, L25, M14

For their very helpful comments on a previous version, I thank Chris Portney, Robert Stavins, Suzy Leonard, and an anonymous referee.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.