Skip Navigation

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2007 1(2):300-318; doi:10.1093/reep/rem019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Right arrow Q50 - General
Right arrow Q53 - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
Right arrow Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
Right arrow Q58 - Government Policy
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

Reflections on the Literature

V. Kerry Smith*

* W. P. Carey Professor of Economics, Arizona State University, and University Fellow, Resources for the Future. Thanks are due to (without implicating them in any way) Allen Basala, Ed Chu, Bill Desvousges, Charlie Kolstad, Subhrendu Pattanayak, Jaren Pope, and Aaron Strong for their suggestions and to Suzy Leonard for her significant contributions in improving its readability. Special thanks are due to Michael Greenstone for a quick and very constructive review of an earlier draft. They are also due to Vicenta Ditto for making sense of numerous earlier drafts of this manuscript

This paper considers two areas of current research related to environmental economics: 1. the use of quasi-experimental or "experimentalist" methods to evaluate the effects of environmental policies; and 2. the implications of the Stern Report on the economic consequences of global climate change. The objective of the paper is to stimulate the discussion and exchange of ideas. The paper examines applications of the experimentalist approach to hedonic property models associated with the regulation of air pollution and the cleanup of hazardous waste at Superfund sites. The discussion of the Stern Report considers whether we should evaluate the merits of reducing the stringency of current environmental policies in order to increase the efforts devoted to controlling pollutants that contribute to long term climate risks.

Key Words: quasi-experimental methods • air pollution policy • hazardous waste policy • climate change


JEL: Q50, D60


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.