Policy Monitor
Edited by Maureen Cropper
The Clean Development Mechanism: History, Status, and Prospects
* Economist, Laboratoire dÉconomie Forestière, UMR INRAENGREF, 14, rue Girardet, CS 14216, F-54042 Nancy cedex, France, Tel: +33 3 83 39 68 96, Fax: +33 3 83 37 06 45
** The World Bank, 1818 H St NW Washington DC 20433, USA. The findings and opinions expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its executive directors, or the countries they represent
lecocq{at}nancy-engref.inra.fr
Through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), governments or firms in developed countries can participate in the financing of projects that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in developing countries in exchange for emission reduction credits that they can use against their targets under the Kyoto Protocol. The CDM has developed very rapidly, and it is second only to the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme among the carbon markets. A typical CDM project today mitigates a gas other than CO2 in Asia, with carbon credits purchased by a European private company. Despite significant limitations, the CDM provides an example of how financing for global public goods can support sustainable development. Looking forward, the CDM is not adapted to support the large-scale mitigation efforts that are required in large countries to meaningfully curb GHG emissions in the future. However, (an improved) CDM could still play a very important role in channeling international carbon finance to small- and medium-sized developing countries.
The authors thank Karan Capoor, Maureen Cropper, Denny Ellerman, Christophe de Gouvello and Jean-Charles Hourcade for their useful comments on earlier drafts of this article. Remaining errors are only the authors'.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Kruger, W. E. Oates, and W. A. Pizer Decentralization in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Lessons for Global Policy Rev Environ Econ Policy, January 1, 2007; 1(1): 112 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
